Should children under twelve own smartphones?: IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer

Smartphones have become so common that many children now receive their first device while still at primary school. Some people believe that this should be prevented entirely for anyone under twelve. I agree with this view to a large extent, although I think the real issue is unrestricted access rather than the phone itself.

The main reason to delay smartphone ownership is the effect on children's development. Many apps and games are deliberately designed to be addictive, and a young child has far less self-control than an adult. Excessive screen time has been linked to poor sleep, weaker concentration in class and less time spent playing outdoors or talking with family. In addition, a personal smartphone exposes children to risks they are not mature enough to handle, such as cyberbullying, contact with strangers and violent or inappropriate content.

On the other hand, parents often give children phones for understandable reasons. A child who travels to school alone or attends after-school activities can call home if there is a problem, and this sense of safety matters to many families. Furthermore, technology is part of modern life, and some argue that children need to develop digital literacy as early as possible.

In my opinion, however, both of these needs can be met without giving young children a full smartphone. A basic phone that can only make calls and send messages allows parents to stay in touch, while computer skills can be taught at school or at home under supervision. Where a smartphone is unavoidable, strict parental controls and daily time limits should be used.

In conclusion, I largely agree that children under twelve should not own smartphones. The potential harm to their health, learning and safety is too great, and the benefits that parents are looking for can be achieved in safer ways.