How band scores really work
Learn the 0–9 band scale, convert Listening and Reading raw scores to bands, calculate your overall band with the official rounding rule, and see what separates band 6, 7 and 8 in Writing and Speaking.
By the end of this lesson you will be able to:
- Describe what each band from 4 to 9 means in practical terms
- Convert Listening and Academic Reading raw scores into bands
- Calculate an overall band correctly, including the .25 and .75 rounding rules
- Explain why Writing Task 2 matters more than Task 1
- Name the four Writing and four Speaking criteria and what lifts a performance from band 6 to 7 to 8
The 0–9 scale
Every section is reported on a scale from 0 to 9, in whole or half bands (5.0, 5.5, 6.0 …). Your overall band is the average of the four section bands, rounded to the nearest half band.
IELTS is criterion-referenced. Your band depends on what you can do, not on how other candidates performed. If everyone in the room writes like a band 7, everyone gets a 7. There is no curve and no quota.
Each band has an official short description of what a learner at that level can do. Here they are, paraphrased, with what they mean in real life.
What the bands mean
| Band | Level | What it means in practice (paraphrased) |
|---|---|---|
9 | Expert | Full command of English: accurate, appropriate and fluent, with complete understanding. |
8 | Very good | Full command with only occasional, unsystematic slips. May misunderstand in unfamiliar situations, but handles complex, detailed argument well. |
7 | Good | Operational command with occasional errors and misunderstandings. Generally handles complex language and follows detailed reasoning. This is the target for many competitive courses. |
6 | Competent | Generally effective command despite some errors. Uses and understands fairly complex language, especially in familiar situations. This is a common minimum for undergraduate study. |
5 | Modest | Partial command. Understands overall meaning in most situations but makes many mistakes. Can handle basic communication in their own field. |
4 | Limited | Basic competence in familiar situations only. Frequent problems with understanding and expression, and cannot use complex language. |
3–1 | Extremely limited to non-user | Communication breaks down often (3), is possible only with isolated words or short phrases (2), or is essentially absent (1). |
0 | Did not attempt | No assessable answers were given. |
Listening and Reading: from raw score to band
Listening and Reading are each marked out of 40, one mark per correct answer. Your raw score is then converted to a band using a conversion table.
The table below shows the widely published approximate conversions. Each test version is carefully equated for difficulty, so the exact cut-offs can shift by a mark or so from one test to another. Use the table to set targets, not to argue over a single mark.
Careful with tables you find online: General Training Reading uses a different, stricter table (roughly 34/40 for a band 7) because its texts are easier. For IELTS Academic, always use the Academic Reading column.
Approximate raw-score conversion (out of 40)
| Band | Listening raw score | Academic Reading raw score |
|---|---|---|
9 | 39–40 | 39–40 |
8.5 | 37–38 | 37–38 |
8 | 35–36 | 35–36 |
7.5 | 32–34 | 33–34 |
7 | 30–31 | 30–32 |
6.5 | 26–29 | 27–29 |
6 | 23–25 | 23–26 |
5.5 | 18–22 | 19–22 |
5 | 16–17 | 15–18 |
4.5 | 13–15 | 13–14 |
4 | 10–12 | 10–12 |
Calculating your overall band
- Add your four section bands.
- Divide by 4.
- Round to the nearest half band, following this rule: an average ending in .25 rounds UP to .5, and an average ending in .75 rounds UP to the next whole band.
Because section bands are always whole or half numbers, the average can only end in .0, .125, .25, .375, .5, .625, .75 or .875. Here is what happens to each ending.
The rounding rule, ending by ending
| Average ends in… | Reported as… | Example |
|---|---|---|
.0 | unchanged | 6.0 → 6.0 |
.125 | rounded DOWN to the whole band | 6.125 → 6.0 |
.25 | rounded UP to .5 | 6.25 → 6.5 |
.375 | rounded UP to .5 | 6.375 → 6.5 |
.5 | unchanged | 6.5 → 6.5 |
.625 | rounded DOWN to .5 | 6.625 → 6.5 |
.75 | rounded UP to the next whole band | 6.75 → 7.0 |
.875 | rounded UP to the next whole band | 6.875 → 7.0 |
| Candidate | L | R | W | S | Total ÷ 4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arif | 6.5 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 24.0 ÷ 4 = 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Imran | 6.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 24.5 ÷ 4 = 6.125 | 6.0 |
| Sadia | 6.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 25.0 ÷ 4 = 6.25 | 6.5 |
| Mitu | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 25.5 ÷ 4 = 6.375 | 6.5 |
| Rafi | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 26.5 ÷ 4 = 6.625 | 6.5 |
| Tasnim | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 27.5 ÷ 4 = 6.875 | 7.0 |
| Nabil | 7.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 28.5 ÷ 4 = 7.125 | 7.0 |
| Zara | 8.0 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 29.0 ÷ 4 = 7.25 | 7.5 |
| Labiba | 8.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 31.0 ÷ 4 = 7.75 | 8.0 |
- Imran vs SadiaIdentical except for Speaking. Sadia’s extra half band moves the average from 6.125 (down to 6.0) to 6.25 (up to 6.5).
- Rafi6.625 does NOT round up. Only .75 and .875 go up to the next whole band. Rafi needs one more half band anywhere to reach 7.0 (27.0 ÷ 4 = 6.75 → 7.0).
- Nabil vs ZaraZara’s higher Listening (8.0 instead of 7.5) gives 7.25, which rounds up to 7.5. Nabil’s 7.125 rounds down to 7.0.
- ShortcutUse totals. For an overall of 6.5 you need a total of at least 25.0; for 7.0, at least 27.0; for 7.5, at least 29.0; for 8.0, at least 31.0.
Check your understanding: conversions and calculations
7 questions- 1
A Listening raw score of 31/40 usually converts to band .
- 2
An Academic Reading raw score of 29/40 usually converts to band .
- 3
Bands: L 6.5, R 6.0, W 6.0, S 6.5. What is the overall band?
- 4
Bands: L 6.0, R 6.0, W 5.5, S 6.0. What is the overall band?
- 5
Bands: L 7.0, R 6.5, W 6.5, S 6.5. What is the overall band?
- 6
The overall band is the mean of the four section bands, rounded to the nearest whole or half band. Averages ending in .25 are rounded up to the next half band, and averages ending in .75 are rounded up to the next whole band.
An average of 7.125 is reported as an overall band of 7.5.
- 7
Put the steps for working out an overall band in order.
Drag the cards (or use the arrows) into the correct order.
- 1Convert Listening and Reading raw scores to bands
- 2Add the four section bands together
- 3Round to the nearest half band (.25 and .75 round up)
- 4Divide the total by four
Answer every question to check.
Writing and Speaking: marked by criteria, not by counting
Writing and Speaking are marked by certified examiners against four criteria each. Each criterion counts for 25% of that task’s score.
| Writing | Speaking |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement (Task 1) / Task Response (Task 2) | Fluency and Coherence |
| Coherence and Cohesion | Lexical Resource |
| Lexical Resource | Grammatical Range and Accuracy |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | Pronunciation |
Task 2 counts twice as much as Task 1 in your Writing band. Think of it as Task 1 = one third and Task 2 = two thirds. Compare two candidates with the same two scores in a different order:
- Task 1 = 7, Task 2 = 6 → (7 + 6 + 6) ÷ 3 ≈ 6.33
- Task 1 = 6, Task 2 = 7 → (6 + 7 + 7) ÷ 3 ≈ 6.67
The second candidate ends up with the higher Writing band. IELTS does not publish its exact internal rounding for Writing and Speaking, so treat these as estimates. The lesson is clear, though: a strong Task 2 pays double. Never steal time from Task 2 to polish Task 1.
Writing: what separates band 6, 7 and 8 (paraphrased from the public descriptors)
| Criterion | Band 6 | Band 7 | Band 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
Task Achievement (Task 1) | Covers the task with an overview, but key features are only adequately highlighted; some details may be irrelevant or inaccurate. | Clear overview of the main trends or differences; key features clearly presented and highlighted, though they could be developed more fully. | Covers all requirements; key features clearly presented, highlighted and illustrated with well-chosen data; only occasional omissions. |
Task Response (Task 2) | Addresses all parts, some more fully than others; a position is present but conclusions may be unclear or repetitive; some ideas underdeveloped. | Addresses all parts; a clear position throughout; main ideas extended and supported, though some may be over-generalised or lack focus. | Sufficiently addresses all parts; well-developed ideas that are relevant, extended and supported; only occasional lapses. |
Coherence and Cohesion | Clear overall progression, but linking can be faulty or mechanical; referencing is not always clear; paragraphing may be illogical at times. | Logical organisation with clear progression; a range of linking devices used appropriately, with some over- or under-use; each paragraph has a clear central topic. | Information sequenced logically; all aspects of cohesion well managed; paragraphing sufficient and appropriate. |
Lexical Resource | Adequate range; attempts less common words with some inaccuracy; spelling or word-formation errors that do not block meaning. | Enough range for some flexibility and precision; less common items used with awareness of style and collocation; occasional errors in word choice, spelling or form. | Wide range used fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings; skilful use of uncommon items with only occasional inaccuracies; rare spelling errors. |
Grammatical Range and Accuracy | A mix of simple and complex sentences; some grammar and punctuation errors, which rarely reduce communication. | A variety of complex structures; frequent error-free sentences; good control, though a few errors remain. | A wide range of structures; the majority of sentences are error-free; only very occasional errors. |
Speaking: what separates band 6, 7 and 8 (paraphrased from the public descriptors)
| Criterion | Band 6 | Band 7 | Band 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
Fluency and Coherence | Willing to speak at length, but coherence is sometimes lost through repetition, self-correction or hesitation; linking words not always appropriate. | Speaks at length without noticeable effort; some hesitation to find language, some repetition; uses a range of connectives and discourse markers with some flexibility. | Fluent, with only occasional repetition or self-correction; hesitation is mostly about ideas, rarely about finding words; topics developed coherently. |
Lexical Resource | Vocabulary wide enough to discuss topics at length and make meaning clear despite some inappropriate choices; generally paraphrases successfully. | Uses vocabulary flexibly on a variety of topics; some less common and idiomatic language, with awareness of style and collocation; paraphrases effectively. | Wide vocabulary used readily and flexibly for precise meaning; less common and idiomatic language used skilfully, with occasional inaccuracies. |
Grammatical Range and Accuracy | A mix of simple and complex structures, with limited flexibility; frequent mistakes in complex structures, though these rarely cause misunderstanding. | A range of complex structures used with some flexibility; frequently error-free sentences, though some mistakes persist. | A wide range of structures used flexibly; the majority of sentences error-free, with only occasional slips. |
Pronunciation | A range of features with mixed control; generally understood, but mispronounced words or sounds sometimes reduce clarity. | All the positive features of band 6 and some, but not all, of band 8. | A wide range of features (stress, rhythm, intonation) used flexibly; easy to understand throughout; first-language accent has minimal effect. |
Same idea, two bands (Task 2 body paragraph)
Around band 5.5–6
Firstly, free education is very important for poor student. Because many students in Bangladesh can not pay the high fees of university. So they can not study and they have to do job for their family. Moreover, government should give more money to the universities. In conclusion, free education has many benefits for the country.
Around band 7.5–8
One compelling argument for abolishing tuition fees is that talent is distributed evenly across society, whereas wealth is not. A gifted student from a farming family in Rangpur, for instance, may be forced to abandon her studies to support relatives, while a less able but wealthier classmate progresses to a degree. If university were free, admission would depend on ability rather than family income, and the country would gain a larger pool of skilled graduates.
**Task Response:** the left paragraph states an idea but never develops it, and it drifts to a new point (government funding) and a ‘conclusion’ in the middle of a body paragraph. The right one states a precise claim, illustrates it and explains the consequence. **Coherence:** ‘Because…’ and ‘So…’ start fragments on the left; the right uses ‘whereas’, ‘for instance’ and ‘while’ naturally. **Lexis:** ‘very important’ and ‘many benefits’ vs ‘compelling argument’, ‘abolishing tuition fees’, ‘pool of skilled graduates’. **Grammar:** errors (‘poor student’, ‘can not’, ‘do job’) vs a second conditional and complex sentences without errors.
Reading practice: why language tests use bands
Work at exam pace. The timer is a guide — it won't stop you.
Final quiz: score like an examiner
12 questions- 1
Ayan needs 7.0 overall. He has L 7.5, R 7.0, S 6.5. What is the LOWEST Writing band that gives him 7.0 overall?
- 2
Which set of bands gives an overall of 7.5?
- 3
To be fairly safe of band 6.5 in Listening, you should aim for at least correct answers out of 40.
- 4
An Academic Reading raw score of 23/40 usually converts to band .
- 5
In the Writing test, how much does Task 2 count compared with Task 1?
- 6
Which TWO of these are official Speaking criteria?
Select 2.
- 7
Match each Writing criterion to what it mainly rewards.
Task ResponseCoherence and CohesionLexical ResourceGrammatical Range and Accuracy - 8
A Speaking candidate receives Fluency 7, Lexical Resource 6, Grammar 6, Pronunciation 7. What is the Speaking band?
- 9
According to the descriptors, what most clearly separates band 7 from band 6 in Task Response (Task 2)?
- 10
IELTS is criterion-referenced: each performance is compared with published descriptors, not with the performance of other candidates.
Only a fixed percentage of candidates on each test date can receive band 7 or above.
- 11
Find and correct the mistake:
My overall band score were 6.5, but my writing score was only 5.5.
- 12
Which user description matches band 7?
Answer every question to check.
Key takeaways
Scoring vocabulary
Saved as flashcards with a free accountcriterion
noun (plural: criteria)/kraɪˈtɪəriən/
A standard by which something is judged or assessed.
মানদণ্ড
Lexical Resource is one of the four criteria used to mark Speaking.
descriptor
noun/dɪˈskrɪptə/
A written statement that describes what performance at a particular level looks like.
বর্ণনাকারী বিবরণ
The band 7 descriptor mentions ‘frequent error-free sentences’.
weighting
noun/ˈweɪtɪŋ/
The relative importance given to one part of a total score.
গুরুত্বের অনুপাত
Task 2 has double the weighting of Task 1 in the Writing test.
threshold
noun/ˈθreʃhəʊld/
The level or point at which something starts to happen or count.
সীমা / প্রারম্ভিক মাত্রা
Thirty correct answers is roughly the threshold for band 7 in Listening.
coherence
noun/kəʊˈhɪərəns/
The quality of being logical and easy to follow as a whole.
সুসংগতি
Clear paragraphs with one main idea each improve the coherence of an essay.
cohesion
noun/kəʊˈhiːʒn/
The way sentences and ideas are connected using linking words, reference words and substitution.
বাক্যের সংযোগ
Overusing ‘moreover’ and ‘furthermore’ can make cohesion feel mechanical.
proportion
noun/prəˈpɔːʃn/
A part or share of a whole, considered in relation to the whole.
অনুপাত
At band 8, a large proportion of sentences are error-free.
round up
phrasal verb/raʊnd ʌp/
To increase a number to the next whole or convenient value.
পূর্ণসংখ্যায় বাড়িয়ে নেওয়া
An average of 6.75 is rounded up to an overall band of 7.0.
Keep your progress
You've completed 0 of 3 activities. A free Abroadway account saves your scores, turns new vocabulary into flashcards and builds a daily plan around your target band, with a full mock exam every week.